Battle for the K-12 Market

If there’s a common thread that unites the rival technology giants Apple, Google, and Microsoft in the education market, it’s this: They’re big. The three major tech companies—along with Amazon, a relatively new player on the scene—go head-to-head in vying for big chunks of school business, most notably in sales of devices and operating systems, and they try to forge their own paths in others. At the same time, all of them are best known for their work outside education, through their sales to consumers, businesses, or both.

Source: Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft Battle for K-12 Market, and Loyalties of Educators – Market Brief

The Pendulum Swing Of Disruption

When a new technology disrupts a traditional incumbent, it normally does so by being 3 things to the end user:

  1. Cheaper/free
  2. Quicker
  3. More convenient

Napster, YouTube, Amazon, Uber, Netflix, all of these companies have done exactly this. Because they most often build market share and presence using external funding, such companies turn existing economics upside down with loss leading tactics. The result is that audiences switch in their millions and incumbents are left in tatters. Any old business that relies on scarcity economics will be swept away.

Source: The Internet’s Adolescence: The Real World Catches Up Eventually | Music Industry Blog

How to make Twitter profitable 


So, here’s a proposal to radically change the economics of Twitter: Charge businesses that exceed a set number of followers (perhaps 250,000) a monthly fee based on their total number of followers. To provide a sense of scale, here are the follower counts for a cross-section of well-known brands:

@TeslaMotors 1.4 million
@Verizon 1.7 million
@Pepsi 3.1 million
@CocaCola 3.4 million
@McDonalds 3.4 million
@Intel 4.7 million
@Marvel 4.9 million
@GoogleChrome 6.1million
@SamsungMobile 12.1 million
@Google 17.6 million

Source: How to make Twitter profitable | TechCrunch

Snapchat Goes Down

Things haven’t gone so well for tech’s most darling IPO of 2017. Snap had a blistering March 2 debut, which saw its first trade occur at $24 after pricing at $17. The stock hit an all-time high of $27.09 on March 3, but has been in a tailspin ever since.

Snap received several “sell” ratings early on as analysts questioned its ability to deal with competition from bigger companies. “Investors in Snap will be exposed to an upstart facing aggressive competition from much larger companies, with a core user base that is not growing by much and which is only relatively elusive,” Brian Wieser, an analyst at Pivotal Research Group, wrote as he placed a $10 target on the stock the day Snap went public.

Source: Snapchat slides below $20 after Instagram’s clone says it has more users (SNAP) | 04/13/17 | Markets Insider